I’ve called Victor Davis Hanson the most important writer in America. He has made it his business to throw historical context around the Left’s and the media’s (but I repeat myself) caricatures of reality, especially in the case of the Iraq war.
I am guilty of following his lead and borrowing his sensibility and integrating it with my own understanding of history and geopolitics.
The recent defection of a handful of sometimes conservative intellectuals to the Obama camp is not mentioned in Hanson’s note posted last night at The Corner. But that’s clearly who he is addressing with this round-up of how Obama’s “by any means necessary” methods have brought him to the brink of power. The whole thing:
The Messianic Style [Victor Davis Hanson]
Individually, the extra-electoral efforts are irrelevant. But in the aggregate, they start to add up. In 1996 Obama goes to court, challenges the petition signatures of mostly African-American voters, and gets all his rivals eliminated from the ballot and so de facto runs unopposed.
In 2004 sealed divorce records were strangely released destroying the chances of his chief Democratic rival Blair Hull; then in the general, lightning again struck, and Republican front-runner Jack Ryan’s sealed divorce records were likewise mysteriously releasedâ€”and he too crashed, in effect, leaving Obama without a serious primary or general election rival.
In this campaign, Acorn galvanizes to register voters and almost immediately runs into serial charges of voter registration fraud. Now an Obama ad runs asking Americans simply to take the day off to help get out the Obama vote: apparently American businesses, universities, and the government all are supposed to sacrifice hundreds of millions of dollars in lost collective work days to subsidize the Obama campaign in order “to change history”?
When one marries all that with the swarming of radio stations when someone like Stanley Kurtz goes on, the threats to go to court to stop ads, or the blacklisting of TV stations who dared to conduct tough interviews, the same old pattern reappears of by any means necessary. And in turn the explanation for all that?
The messianic styleâ€”the cosmic tug to “change history”, or stop the seas from rising or the planet from heating, juxtaposed with the creepy faux-Greek columns, Michelle’s “deign to enter” politics snippet, the fainting at rallies, the Victory Column mass address, the vero possumus presidential seal, and the ‘we are the change we’ve been waiting for’ mantraâ€”reflects the omnipresent narcissism: the exalted ends of electing a prophet always justify the often crude and all too mortal means.
If this is considered ‘right’, I’d rather be wrong with McCain.